<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Should &#8220;Classical&#8221; Music Be Called?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://classicalconvert.com/2007/05/what-should-classical-music-be-called/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://classicalconvert.com/2007/05/what-should-classical-music-be-called/</link>
	<description>A beginners guide to classical music, by someone who switched at 23</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 10:03:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: pseudonymus bosch</title>
		<link>http://classicalconvert.com/2007/05/what-should-classical-music-be-called/comment-page-1/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>pseudonymus bosch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2007 21:12:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://classicalconvert.com/2007/05/what-should-classical-music-be-called/#comment-24</guid>
		<description>You should be lucky if &quot;classical&quot; puts people in mind of Haydn - Il Divo is more likely. Saying Renaissance or Baroque is probably OK for that stuff...perhaps 19th century for your favourite repertoire?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You should be lucky if &#8220;classical&#8221; puts people in mind of Haydn &#8211; Il Divo is more likely. Saying Renaissance or Baroque is probably OK for that stuff&#8230;perhaps 19th century for your favourite repertoire?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

