What I Want From A Classical MP3 Music Store
With all the delightful Amazon hoopla, and our inevitable plummet into electronic instead of polycarbonate means of musical distribution, I’ve been musing around on what I reckon the most absolutely perfect online music download experience would be like. This was in part triggered off by a couple of great comments on this post, discussing the current limitations of classical MP3s, in which the pricing per track issue was mentioned.
Classical music doesn’t work so well in online music stores. The (well, one) problem is this: with pop music, people tend to just want a track or two from an album (you know, the only good, non-filler ones) or they buy the whole thing because they like the artist. Our musical overlords have decided that the proper price is 99c per track, and this is now the fundamental bargaining unit of the online music economy.
Well, classical kind of screws this up. No-one wants to buy just one movement from a symphony (unless you fancy putting together one of those ‘Most Relaxing Classical Album In The World!!!’ monstrosities, in which case I hate you), but how are things then priced? Is one movement still equivalent to one track? That would mean (taking some extreme examples off the top of my head) Turangalila costs over $10, but Mahler 9 costs about $4, while each lasts about the same amount of time.
It doesn’t really make sense to charge based on individual tracks… so you can charge for the whole album instead. However, while this makes sense for experimental-type pop groups (e.g. Godspeed You! Black Emperor) who have “songs” which last the entire CD long, it makes less sense for a lot of classical releases. The difference is that with the “pop” (yeah, I think pop really deserves the quotation marks this time. I can’t see Britney releasing a twenty minute long song any time soon. And that’s a very good thing.) the whole album is connected. Some classical releases are like that too: any symphony which lasts for over 50 minutes is basically going to fill a whole CD, and it makes sense to bundle it as one. However, most classical CDs contain multiple symphonies, or concertos, with maybe an esoteric suite or song thrown in for variety and padding.
It doesn’t make sense to be forced into buying this whole CD, when what you really wanted was a specific opus. For example, if I wanted to get Haitink’s Shostakovich 10 on this CD, I might well be forced into purchasing symphony No. 2 instead. Which, well, isn’t a very good piece.
Essentially the problem is that classical music does not have the same quanta (whoops, physics), the same inherent units, that pop does. Pop is almost always constructed from ~3-6 minute long tracks, combined into an ~50 minute album. Classical pieces are constructed from movements which are anywhere from 3 to 30 minutes long, bundled together into a complete piece which might be as short as the smallest unit (e.g. a single song) or might be as long as 3 hours (a looong opera).
My solution is called ClassicalConcert.com, oops, no, wait, ebay owns that. How about MyClassicalConcert.com? Too lame sounding? Well, whatever, we’ll leave the branding to the experts. The M.O. is like this:
- Classical pieces are available in their natural state. You buy a concerto, a symphony, always a whole opus at once.
- The opuses are priced in a tiered fashion < 10 minutes = 99c, 10-20 minutes=$1.99, etc. It’s not based on number of tracks, nor some 1 minute=27c conversion which gives really uncomfortable, unwieldy looking totals.
- The opuses are packaged together into concerts. This is the key selling point. Several experts will put together packages of pieces with a unifying (or contrasting) theme, just as real concerts are organized, but with more flexibility. Instead of buying by opus you tend to buy by “concert”.
- The concerts will have program notes, for a surcharge (say a couple bucks) you can download the virtual program notes for a concert, written by whoever put the thing together.
- If you already own a piece you don’t buy it again, so if someone packages together a new concert, and you already bought one of the pieces in it, you don’t pay twice. You just pay for the program notes, if you want them, and the opuses you don’t own.
- Anyone can create concerts. People can submit their own personally designed concerts. These can also be community efforts, designed online, with message boards and stuff.
- Concert designers would get a cut of the profits. If a concert you design is popular, you earn sweet, sweet moolah and the adoration of your peers.
A complete symphony cycle would be available as one “concert”, or (as that article the other day mentioned) you could have a bunch of different conductors doing one symphony cycle. You could have a concert which was two side-by-side performances of the same piece, but by different conductors. Or you could just package things up like regular CDs or live performances



September 27th, 2007 at 8:23 am
One particular reason why this could be interesting for me is the following: Sometimes there’s a Vivaldi concerto I haven’t heard and don’t have it in my collection (say, a 10 minutes long piece in three tracks), yet I have all others from the CD.
It’s hard for me to buy the whole CD when I’m on a tight budget just for that particular concerto.
And a 256 kb/s mp3 should be, for all but the finest ears on some great (and pricy) equipment, be practically indistinguishable from a CD.
This also goes the other way around: perhaps I like a concerto very much, and would like to hear a performance from someone else.
September 27th, 2007 at 12:50 pm
You’re dreaming, Zoltan. I downloaded the same track from Amazon (in 256k MP3) and from iTunes (in AAC) and the difference is immediately apparent even on my computer speakers. See http://blog.choralnet.org/2007/09/amazon-goes-mp3.html
On another topic, I don’t think it’s practical to give “concert designers” a cut, and isn’t necessary; user-designed “playlists” are ubiquitous on iTunes without any financial incentive. But anyway, the “concert” idea puts an artificial constraint (concert length) similar to the “album” problem. It’s one thing for a website to suggest “if you like THIS, then you’ll probably like THAT”, but I think we can otherwise trust users to decide which pieces go together.
The challenge is how do you get tracks? The whole song/album concept was developed by iTunes and the other online distributors in order to encourage record companies to buy in to the deal. If the record companies don’t participate, you’re never going to have enough repertoire to be interesting.
Finally, what’s wrong with 27c/minute? You’re going to buy it on a credit card (or Paypal or something) anyway, so it’s not like you’re going to get a pocketful of pennies. Who cares whether your total is some weird number? That doesn’t bother people on any other kind of online purchase. Besides, $1.99 is itself a weird number. What’s wrong with $2?
September 27th, 2007 at 11:51 pm
wahoofive, are you seriously claiming that 128Kbps AAC is better quality than 256Kbps MP3?
As for the “concert” thing, people should of course be free to download whatever the hell they liked, without being forced to buy in packages – I feel that a well designed classical package is infinity times more rewarding than a pop playlist. one of the biggest deals for me is reading peoples descriptions of why they put the pieces together, essentially, I don’t want to lose liner notes.
I think the distribution of tracks is a good point. One of the advantages that classical music has is that a piece can be performed by any orchestra who wants to play it. What would be great is if the orchestras themselves licensed the tracks for resale (I realize that any kind of openness in the music industry tends to be wishful thinking, but this is a hypothetical idea)
The pricing issue is a psychological thing. Personally I find it kind of disturbing when things are priced with essentially random values, there’s a comfort in having things priced in tiers. there’s a good reason why, when you go into most high-street stores, things are priced at $1.99, $4.99 and so on. People like standardization, and 99c looks cheaper than rounding up to the dollar.
October 23rd, 2007 at 8:39 am
I have found e-music (www.emusic.com) to be the best site for classical music. The gist of it is you subscribe I pay $24.99 for 100 tracks a month. With those tracks you can download any track you want from any album. You can download the whole album if you want, one symphony from the album, one movement, etc. Its DRM free. Once you download it, the tracks are yours. You can burn it to cd, put it on an ipod, or even download it again. Emusic keeps a tab of everything you’ve downloaded, and if say your pc crashes and you need to get your music again you can. This is also helpful if you have donwloaded one piece on a cd and then decide later you want the rest of the cd. You can download the whole album without the tracks you have already downloaded counting against you. The only downside that I can see is the per track cost tends to favor larger works with fewer tracks. Mahler’s Sixth Symphony would cost $1.00 (.25 a track) while an album of Poulenc piano music would cost $8.25 (33 tracks at .25 a track). The site is populated with a good selection of lables – Naxos, Chandos, LSO Live, CSO Resound, Avie, Pentatone, BIS, Dorian, Harmonia Mundi, Vox etc. I think the last time I looked the site had 23,000 classical albums available.