The Top 50 Classical Blogs, Using 4 Different Methods
Some of you will probably have noticed that a couple of days ago ACD decided to release his own list of the 50 top classical music blogs (which incidentally should more properly be called the top 53, using his current dense-ranking method) based on the number of incoming links according to the god of the internet, Google. In the process he somewhat pissed off a few people, notably Scott over at Musical Perceptions who has been compiling his own rankings for the last couple of years (using the Technorati authority number) but whom ACD neglected to credit with prior art (there is a rather bitter exchange in the comments over at Musical Perceptions here). Also myself (though I’d say it’s irritated then pissed off) due to refusing to use the URL which everybody actually links to in their blogroll to determine the number of incoming links. However, it is his blog, his screening choices, his rankings list.
Well, it occurred to me that since I spend every day managing large chunks of data and automating stuff I could probably whip up a script which automatically calculates my own classical blog rankings, according to my own choices. So I did exactly that. There may be a couple of bugs still, if you find anything in error please let me know so I can patch it up. I was particularly interested in trying to perform this in the most scientific way possible, so I’ve used four distinct methods of ranking. There is the Google incoming links method (as ACD uses), the Technorati authority method (which Scott uses) but additionally I use Bloglines RSS feed subscribers (which Chris Foley did once) and a completely new method, which is the number of Google Reader subscribers.
Now, I’m considering this a bit of a beta-test since I probably missed a few blogs which should have been included (I tried to combine ACD’s list and the Musical Perceptions list, along with a bunch of others, the complete list I used is here, add yours if I’m missing it please!) and there might be a couple of mistakes. While the program I use obviously has a larger chance of having a bug then a human does (depending upon caffeine ingested), the huge advantage is that it only takes around five minutes to collect and analyze all the data for about 100 blogs. What I’d like is for people to suggest improvements, for example, should I combine the results together to produce a super-ranking? Should I combine the RSS feed data with the Technorati authority to give a “current readership” number? If people are interested I’ll polish it up and analyze it differently.
So without further ado, here are the “top” 50 blogs as of yesterday using four different ranking methods, the first number next to each blog is it’s rank, the number in parentheses is the total number of subscribers, number of incoming links, etc.



April 5th, 2008 at 6:09 am
This is probably the classical blogosphere’s most relevant ranking list and thanks for taking the time to compile it.
April 5th, 2008 at 8:24 am
Roger Bourland is nr. 27 in the Technorati authority with 58, tied with oboeinsight
April 5th, 2008 at 9:10 am
Hi Roger, thanks for the catch, it’s been updated.
Chris, thanks for your kind words.
April 5th, 2008 at 9:32 am
Cool! For the Bloglines subscriptions, can you alter the program to grab numbers from alternate subscription types (e.g. Atom vs. rss2) and add them together? That’s what Chris did in his original list. I think one good combination would be to add the Google
Readers and Blogline readers for a total number of readers (at least for those two major rss readers). Have you looked to see if other readers’ numbers can be grabbed, like Kinja? Or also add the number of favorites from Technorati, since those are basically using Technorati as a reader.
One interesting combination would be to normalize each value and then calculate an average. This would acknowledge that some blogs are more influential by the number of regular readers, and some by the number of links from fellow bloggers.
April 5th, 2008 at 10:24 am
Hi Ben,
Well done for putting in such a lot of work. It sounds like a good way of doing it to me, but I’m not to clued up on all this technical stuff.
Thanks for including me in the blogs used for calculating the top 50, maybe next year we’ll make the list.
I’ll have to get Robin to go and do something outrageous just to pull a few more readers in….
Anna
April 5th, 2008 at 11:01 am
Excellent.
Ben, were you able to run a script on Google for incoming links or did you have to separately search for each blog?
April 5th, 2008 at 1:22 pm
Scott,
Great suggestions! I’ll have a look into extracting both of the bloglines scores. In principal I can add other rankings as well, I just have to work out a way to programmatically retrieve the rankings. Kinja unfortunately looks like it might be a bit awkward. If there are any good sources you can think of let me know.
I kind of like the idea of coming up with two combined rankings. One would be the “establishment” score (maybe an average of Google incomings, total technorati links) while the other could be a “readership” type score (maybe both RSS feeds and technorati authority) but I wonder if certain ranks should be given more weight in the averages.
Ben
April 5th, 2008 at 1:28 pm
Anna,
You’re welcome, thanks, and good luck forcing Robin into doing something outrageous :)
Lisa,
The script does it automatically. I just feed in a file containing the blog names and URLs, and it conducts a search for each in turn, extracts the score and outputs it to a spreadsheet. I just do a few manual checks afterward to make sure things aren’t going awry, and patch up the ones which didn’t work perfectly for one reason or another.
April 5th, 2008 at 5:13 pm
Talk about a comprehensive project! Very cool. I need to check and see how many of them I’m following in Google Reader. It seems to be the only way I scan the blogosphere these days.
April 5th, 2008 at 7:33 pm
[...] Drew feels that some are being overlooked (you have to read the comments at ACD’s place). Classical Convert put together his own list because he felt ACD didn’t do right by him and some others. Due to these last lists I’m [...]
April 5th, 2008 at 10:29 pm
Ben, could I possibly see your script? I’ve tried to find information on using scripts to query Google off and on over the years without success.
April 5th, 2008 at 11:26 pm
Hi Lisa,
Sure! The collection and processing are broken up into two separate scripts, but I guess the piece you are interested in is the one that actually grabs the data from Google, the relevant section is:
Which is a function in Python that takes an address as argument, crafts a header to not look like urllib2 is requesting the page (as Google replies with a 403 if the user-agent doesn’t look like a browser for “link:” searches) requests the page and extracts the number using a regular expression. It’s not terribly elegant, but it works!
April 6th, 2008 at 11:38 pm
[...] 7, 2008 by Zach Carstensen The old site, Classical In Seattle, has made the top fifty classical music blogs under a couple of different calculations. Daily Observations down in Portland also cracked [...]
April 7th, 2008 at 12:23 am
Ben, thank you so much.
April 8th, 2008 at 3:31 pm
[...] stumbled upon a post over at Classical Convert which has published lists of the Top 50 Classical Music Blogs using four different metrics – most [...]
April 10th, 2008 at 2:18 pm
By all four of your measures, Nico Muhly’s blog (nicomuhly.com) would make the top twenty, when not the top ten.
April 13th, 2008 at 9:48 pm
Gabor,
Thanks, I’ll add Nico to the list for the next iteration.
Ben
April 16th, 2008 at 7:32 am
Wow… I’ve been a programmer for years (albeit, not a very good one) – used to work for Netscape when it ruled the WWW up until AOL let us all go…
…and yet it never ceases to amazing me the lovely little gems (like what Ben posted) for scripting all sorts of ways to more effectively use the internet.
Not only a nice list, but a new way of compiling my own..
April 28th, 2008 at 12:43 pm
[...] Top 50 Classical Blogs, Using 4 Different Methods [...]
September 24th, 2008 at 3:56 pm
Very nice blog! This is very informative. Keep it up!
October 6th, 2008 at 9:22 am
Excellent, I have now added this to my Bookmarks.
Best
Bob
February 22nd, 2009 at 2:52 am
Excellent collection! Thank you for sharing!
February 22nd, 2009 at 2:54 am
This is a vital collection of cultural links. The greatest composers may long be dead, but their music sounds on!
July 29th, 2009 at 7:44 am
This is a very convenient and informative list. I’ll definitely revisit some of the blogs listed. Also check out the classical music website http://www.musicride.org.
July 30th, 2009 at 10:20 am
Sounds like lot of effort. Managing lot of data and rankings sure needs lot hard work.
December 3rd, 2009 at 4:12 pm
As an orchestral composer, this is an amazing list. There’s tons of great material out there. Great Post!
February 15th, 2010 at 11:17 am
[...] Here, now, is an entertainment-quotient blog roundup, semi-based on this terrifyingly scientific roundup of classical blogs: [...]
March 2nd, 2010 at 9:20 pm
Thanks for complilng this list. Im a Classical Guitarist and am always looking for interesting sites. Thanks!