<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Varying</title>
	<atom:link href="http://classicalconvert.com/2009/05/varying/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://classicalconvert.com/2009/05/varying/</link>
	<description>A beginners guide to classical music, by someone who switched at 23</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 05:15:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: JonJ</title>
		<link>http://classicalconvert.com/2009/05/varying/comment-page-1/#comment-114409</link>
		<dc:creator>JonJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 05:21:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://classicalconvert.com/?p=1165#comment-114409</guid>
		<description>I would call the passage you refer to a bridge between the theme and the first variation. But I wouldn&#039;t swear to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would call the passage you refer to a bridge between the theme and the first variation. But I wouldn&#8217;t swear to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://classicalconvert.com/2009/05/varying/comment-page-1/#comment-114208</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 02:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://classicalconvert.com/?p=1165#comment-114208</guid>
		<description>the four most common ones that i&#039;ve heard/used are Prok, Rach, Shost/Shosty and Tchaik. (now we just need a russian composer whose name starts with a Q)

i&#039;ve also heard &quot;wolfy&quot; for mozart. ...might want confirmation before putting it on the list</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the four most common ones that i&#8217;ve heard/used are Prok, Rach, Shost/Shosty and Tchaik. (now we just need a russian composer whose name starts with a Q)</p>
<p>i&#8217;ve also heard &#8220;wolfy&#8221; for mozart. &#8230;might want confirmation before putting it on the list</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zoltan</title>
		<link>http://classicalconvert.com/2009/05/varying/comment-page-1/#comment-114206</link>
		<dc:creator>Zoltan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 08:13:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://classicalconvert.com/?p=1165#comment-114206</guid>
		<description>&quot;Rach&quot; for Rachmaninoff is an easy one to guess.
A more curious one is for Beethoven. Since I would call Bruckner&#039;s 9th as &quot;B9&quot;, Beethoven&#039;s cannot be B9 so it became &quot;Bee9&quot; for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Rach&#8221; for Rachmaninoff is an easy one to guess.<br />
A more curious one is for Beethoven. Since I would call Bruckner&#8217;s 9th as &#8220;B9&#8243;, Beethoven&#8217;s cannot be B9 so it became &#8220;Bee9&#8243; for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://classicalconvert.com/2009/05/varying/comment-page-1/#comment-114205</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 03:10:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://classicalconvert.com/?p=1165#comment-114205</guid>
		<description>Nice! I want more abbreviations... I&#039;m going to start mentally collecting all these short versions of composer names and stick &#039;em in a post...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice! I want more abbreviations&#8230; I&#8217;m going to start mentally collecting all these short versions of composer names and stick &#8216;em in a post&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zoltan</title>
		<link>http://classicalconvert.com/2009/05/varying/comment-page-1/#comment-114196</link>
		<dc:creator>Zoltan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 08:53:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://classicalconvert.com/?p=1165#comment-114196</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s my crazy abbreviation: since DSCH stands for Shostakovich, coming from the German spelling &quot;Schostakowitsch&quot;, I use the same for Tchaikovsky: TSCH standing for &quot;Tschaikowski&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s my crazy abbreviation: since DSCH stands for Shostakovich, coming from the German spelling &#8220;Schostakowitsch&#8221;, I use the same for Tchaikovsky: TSCH standing for &#8220;Tschaikowski&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yvonne</title>
		<link>http://classicalconvert.com/2009/05/varying/comment-page-1/#comment-114189</link>
		<dc:creator>Yvonne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 09:17:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://classicalconvert.com/?p=1165#comment-114189</guid>
		<description>Re the challenge of abbreviation: &quot;Tchaik&quot; has been the long-standing solution in my neck of the woods, as in &quot;Let&#039;s go and hear the XSO play Tchaik 4 tomorrow night.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re the challenge of abbreviation: &#8220;Tchaik&#8221; has been the long-standing solution in my neck of the woods, as in &#8220;Let&#8217;s go and hear the XSO play Tchaik 4 tomorrow night.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

